A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specifically in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute from the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up files, maps, and problems attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to develop a relatives property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the René Collier and Paul Feely site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.